Although Java Deserialization attacks were known for years, the publication of the Apache Commons Collection Remote Code Execution RCE from now on gadget finally brought this forgotten vulnerability to the spotlight and motivated the community to start finding and fixing these issues. One of the most suggested solutions for avoiding Java deserialization issues was to move away from Java Deserialization altogether and use safer formats such as JSON.
However, the lack of RCE gadgets led some software vendors to not take this issue seriously as happened to Java before. In this talk, we will analyze.
We will demonstrate that RCE is also possible in. NET and present details about the serializers that are vulnerable to RCE by default and discuss common configurations that make other libraries vulnerable. We will try to generalize the attack techniques to other serialization formats and conclude with presenting several gadgets from system libraries that may be used to achieve RCE for the analyzed serializers.
Finally, we will provide recommendations on how to determine if your code is vulnerable, provide remediation advice, and discuss alternative approaches. Speaker Deck.
Python Deserialization Denial of Services Attacks and Their Mitigations
Sign in Sign up for free. Alvaro October 20, Tweet Share. Want more? Apr 6, Oct 24, Oct 20, Apr 30, Nov 18, Oct 1, Nov 19, Nov 20, Nov 15, Nov 13, Nov 8, Mar 17, Insecure Deserialization, also known as Untrusted Deserialization, is a serious category of Application Security issues potentially affecting most modern systems.
Some recent application security incidents involving Insecure Deserialization vulnerabilities are the following:. The complete list as tracked by the CVE is quite long. In fact, the media declared as the Java deserialization apocalypse year. Complex modern systems are highly distributed. As the components communicate with each other and share information such as moving data between services, storing information, etcthe native binary format is not ideal.
In short, serialization is the process of turning this binary data into a string ascii characters so it can be moved using standard protocols. When the data being serialized and deserialized is trusted under the control of the systemthere are no risks. However, when the input can be modified by the user, the result is an untrusted deserialization vulnerability. In this case, the conversion back from string to binary deserialization is a delicate operation prone to abuse.
The typical course of action is to prepare a payload that includes remote code execution in the targeted machine. Often, the goal is to run system commands. Any serialized data used by an application is at risk of manipulation, so ideally it should be accompanied by a cryptographic signature that enables integrity checks.
This validation would prevent tampering of the serialized data. A well-known Insecure Deserialization example is the Struts 2 remote execution incidentwhich gained worldwide attention in for being the attack vector exploited in the Equifax hack.
We now build the XML payload. In our example, the payload is a static construction under the constant xmlPayload. This format is common, and it can be easily integrated in automated attack tools such as Metasploit. The key element in the payload is a collection of classes that Struts will reassemble as part of the request preprocessing.
Included in this collection, is the class type, along with the parameter that the class takes. Notably, if the class type is a ProcessBuilderStruts will accept and execute this input. In sum, this is the core exploit:. Frequently, Insecure Deserialization involves remote execution. In our video example, we chose to remotely start the Calculator app in the server running the vulnerable Struts system.
The particular command we are launching is:. Simply by constructing the request as described above, and sending it to a vulnerable Struts server, we have managed to run remote code.
The installation of Hdiv RASP is as easy as including the following parameter in your web application server launch command.
Untrusted deserialization attacks are closely related to the runtime process and the actions can be very dynamic. DASTs will not identify undocumented vulnerabilities that are particular to your application. WAFs are a mature defense technology that work at the edge of the application by creating a perimeter.
Due to this external-only approach, the only solution is applying input validation.This article is focused on providing clear, actionable guidance for safely deserializing untrusted data in your applications.
Serialization is the process of turning some object into a data format that can be restored later. People often serialize objects in order to save them to storage, or to send as part of communications.
Deserialization is the reverse of that process, taking data structured from some format, and rebuilding it into an object. Today, the most popular data format for serializing data is JSON. Before that, it was XML. However, many programming languages offer a native capability for serializing objects. Unfortunately, the features of these native deserialization mechanisms can be repurposed for malicious effect when operating on untrusted data.
Attacks against deserializers have been found to allow denial-of-service, access control, and remote code execution RCE attacks. The following language-specific guidance attempts to enumerate safe methodologies for deserializing data that can't be trusted. Check the use of unserialize function and review how the external parameters are accepted.
If the traffic data contains the symbol dot. The following API in Python will be vulnerable to serialization attack. Search code for the pattern below. The following techniques are all good for preventing attacks against deserialization against Java's Serializable format. If the captured traffic data include the following patterns may suggest that the data was sent in Java serialization streams. If there are data members of an object that should never be controlled by end users during deserialization or exposed to users during serialization, they should be declared as the transient keyword section Protecting Sensitive Information.
For a class that defined as Serializable, the sensitive information variable should be declared as private transient. For example, the class myAccount, the variable 'profit' and 'margin' were declared as transient to avoid to be serialized:. Some of your application objects may be forced to implement Serializable due to their hierarchy.
To guarantee that your application objects can't be deserialized, a readObject method should be declared with a final modifier which always throws an exception:. The java. ObjectInputStream class is used to deserialize objects. It's possible to harden its behavior by subclassing it. This is the best solution if:. The general idea is to override ObjectInputStream. Because this call happens before a readObject is called, you can be sure that no deserialization activity will occur unless the type is one that you wish to allow.
A simple example of this shown here, where the the LookAheadObjectInputStream class is guaranteed not to deserialize any other type besides the Bicycle class:. As mentioned above, the java. However, if you don't own the code or can't wait for a patch, using an agent to weave in hardening to java.
ObjectInputStream is the best solution.Serialization and Deserialization are mechanisms used in many environment web, mobile, IoT, However, we will see in this article how this kind of behavior can be very dangerous With pythonthe default library used to serialize and deserialize objects is pickle.
It is a really easy to use library compared to something like sqlite3 and very convenient if you need to persist data.
In order to illustrate the awesomeness of pickle in term of insecurity, I developed a vulnerable application. As always with my Dockerjust execute the build. For those who don't know this show shame Rick is a genius scientist who travel between universes and planets for great adventures with his grand son Morty.
The show implies many multiverse and time-travel dilemma. Each universe got their own Rick, so I developed an application for every Rick, so they can trace their adventures by storing when, where and with who they travelled. Each Ricks must be able to use the application, and the data should never be stored on the server, so one Rick cannot see the data of other Ricks.
Obviously, this application is vulnerable Rick would not offer other Ricks this kind of gift without a backdoor If you don't want to be spoiled, and want to play a little game, you should stop reading this article and try to launch the application locallyand try to pwn it :- Without looking at the exploit folder obviously, This method should return a list of n elements, the first being a callable, and the others arguments.
The callable will be executed with underlying arguments, and the result will be the "unserialization" of the object. For exemple, if you save the following pickle object:. A Powned will be displayed with the loads function, as echo Powned will be executed. It's easy then to imagine what we can do with such a powerful vulnerability. In the pickle-prick application, pickle is used in order to retrieve all adventures:.
So if we upload a malicious pickleit will be executed. In order to do that, we will use the vulnerability twice: a first time to upload a malicious python code, and a second time to execute it. We want to upload a python file that contain a callable that meets adventures signature and will be executed on the server.
Now, let's create a pickle that will write this file on the server:. As the os.Comment 0. The problem that occurs when applications deserialize data from untrusted sources is one of the most widespread security vulnerabilities to occur over the last couple years. This article will provide background on the deserialization vulnerability and describe the limitations of the existing mitigation techniques.
Toward the end of this article, you will find information that explains why the currently available solutions are not adequate to properly solve the problem in enterprise environments, and how an innovative solution based on runtime virtualization ideally solves this problem.
Serializationor marshalling, is the process of converting a memory object into a stream of bytes in order to store it into the filesystem or transfer it to another remote system. Deserialization, also known as unmarshalling, is the reverse process that converts the serialized stream of bytes back to an object in the memory of the machine. All main programming languages provide facilities to perform native serialization and deserialization and most of them are inherently unsafe.
Recent research by Lawrence, FrohoffBreen and Kaiserdemonstrated working deserialization attacks on popular Java applications and frameworks that allow Remote Command Execution. To demonstrate their findings they created the ysoserial tool, a proof-of-concept tool for generating payloads that exploit unsafe Java object deserialization.
The main driver for their research was the finding of a dangerous class in the Apache Commons Collection library. The name of that class is the InvokerTransformer. Any application, server or framework that depended on the Apache Commons Collection was potentially vulnerable.
Explaining all the internal details of the deserialization exploits goes beyond the scope of this article and this has already been done with great success. However, a few important concepts need to be explained that will allow us to identify the gaps in the existing mitigations and highlight the necessity for a new solution to the problem.
YAML Deserialization Attack in Python
Attackers abuse this functionality and manage to invoke any method they want. The deserialization proof of concept exploit tool ysoserial abuses the InvokerTransformer and instead of transforming a collection object, it invokes the Runtime. In order to abuse the InvokerTransformer and make it invoke arbitrary dangerous methods, such as the Runtime.
In the case of the Apache Commons Collections, the InvokerTransformer is a gadget in the malicious gadget chain. Note that every time a new gadget chain is identified, the ysoserial tool is updated to showcase how these gadget chains work. One important thing to note here is that most gadget chains utilise gadgets from third-party components, such as the InvokerTransformer from the Apache Commons Collection.
These gadget chains contain only JRE gadgets. Nothing more than just a vulnerable version of the JVM is required for such chains to exploit the system.
In most cases, the exploit is possible without any authentication. Finally, note that an attack on a server like WebLogic could impact all its running web applications. For these reasons, deserialization vulnerabilities are considered to be critical vulnerabilities with a CVSS score from 7. It must also deserialize data from unsafe locations. It is the combination of both these criteria that introduces the vulnerability. The InvokerTransformer by itself is not vulnerable.
Even though Apache stated that the InvokerTransformer cannot be blamed for this vulnerability, they hardened the InvokerTransformer by removing its ability to be serialized. However, this means that such a change breaks backward compatibility and any application that was dependent on serializing the InvokerTransformer would break. To overcome this limitation the Apache community decided to introduce a system property that will restore the previous, potentially unsafe behavior of the InvokerTransformer.
It must be either one or the other, based on a system property.Insecure Deserialization is a vulnerability which occurs when untrusted data is used to abuse the logic of an application, inflict a denial of service DoS attack, or even execute arbitrary code upon it being deserialized. In order to understand what insecure deserialization is, we first must understand what serialization and deserialization are.
Serialization refers to a process of converting an object into a format which can be persisted to disk for example saved to a file or a datastoresent through streams for example stdoutor sent over a network. Web applications make use of serialization and deserialization on a regular basis and most programming languages even provide native features to serialize data especially into common formats like JSON and XML. The trouble however, starts when deserializing untrusted user input.
Most programming languages offer the ability to customize deserialization processes. Successful insecure deserialization attacks could allow an attacker to carry out denial-of-service DoS attacks, authentication bypasses and remote code execution attacks. The following is an example of insecure deserialization in Python.
This example will serialize an exploit to run the whoami command, and deserialize it with pickle. That is never deserialize data that has travelled over a network or come from a data source or input stream that is not controlled by your application. Do bear in mind however, that there may still be cases where it is possible to introduce vulnerabilities even when using such serialization formats.
The following is an simple unsafe example that loads a YAML file and parses it. Unfortunately, yaml. Instead, the safe method of doing this would be to use the yaml. NET and other languages can also be susceptible to insecure deserialization vulnerabilities. Serialization and deserialization vary greatly depending on the programming language, serialization formats and software libraries used. While this makes the vulnerability harder to find and exploit, it by no means makes it any less dangerous.
The dark mode beta is finally here. Change your preferences any time. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. Learn more. How to serialize an Exception Ask Question. Asked 2 years, 8 months ago. Active 1 month ago.
Viewed 6k times. When I try to serialize an exception using json. Is there something more intelligent that saving str exn? I would prefer a human-readable text representation not pickle. You could capture the exception object and pickle it? You can pass the pickled data as a binary payload in a JSON object. Your comment suggests that the answer is "no".
You didn't make that clear. It seemed like you wanted some way of communicating execptions remotely. Active Oldest Votes. Use tblib With the latter, you can pass wrapped exceptions and also reraise them later. David Weinberg David Weinberg 1 1 gold badge 5 5 silver badges 22 22 bronze badges. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook.
Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown.